J jack2818 New Member Aug 1, 2013 1 0 0 Oct 9, 2013 #1 Would it be possible to have the option to use the amazons glacier service instead of s3? Its significantly cheaper.
Would it be possible to have the option to use the amazons glacier service instead of s3? Its significantly cheaper.
adam Administrator Staff member Dec 5, 2009 2,046 108 63 Oct 9, 2013 #2 It is cheaper but it's also a lot slower to access the data, likely 4+ hours. So it's not ideal for servers which need quick access to restoring.
It is cheaper but it's also a lot slower to access the data, likely 4+ hours. So it's not ideal for servers which need quick access to restoring.
